A Call for Tiered Access to Google Book Search Terminals
Mac Slocum
November 4, 2008
| Permalink
| Comments (1)
|
Listen
Peter Brantley says proposed public access (pdf) to Google Book Search library terminals is too restrictive, particularly in areas serving underprivileged populations:
This is not an economic matter; it is a social foundation. A library is a refuge; you can provide solace in that refuge, and a promise for a different and better kind of future. It is morally incumbent upon you to do so.
I propose that public terminals be accessible on a tiered basis. If a certain percentage of a public library's served population falls beneath the poverty level or a similar metric, the number of public access terminals is commensurately increased.
Related Stories:
- Reaction to Google Book Search Settlement
- EFF's Concerns About the Google Book Search Settlement
- Siva Vaidhyanathan "My initial take on the Google-publishers settlement"
- David Rothman: "TeleRead vision vs. Google book settlement: Bring the e-books HOME"
- Google Book Search Agreement
- ALA 2008: Librarians and Patrons Want More Openness
- Stay Connected
-

TOC RSS Feeds
News Posts
Commentary Posts
Combined Feed
New to RSS?
Subscribe to the TOC newsletter. 
Follow TOC on Twitter. 
Join the TOC Facebook group. 
Join the TOC LinkedIn group. 
Get the TOC Headline Widget.
- Search
-
- TOC In-Depth
-
Impact of P2P and Free Distribution on Book Sales This report tests assumptions about free digital book distribution and P2P impact on sales. Learn more.
The StartWithXML report offers a pragmatic look at XML tools and publishing workflows. Learn more.
Dive into the skills and tools critical to the future of publishing. Learn more.
- Tag Cloud
- TOC Community Topics
-



November 5, 2008 4:33 AM
there's 100 things wrong in this agreement...
and you pick 1, and act like that's all there is?
are you _trying_ to distract our attention this way?
-bowerbird