EFF Attorney: Google Book Search Settlement Weakens Innovation
In an editorial in The Recorder, Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation says Google's settlement with publishers and authors signals an implicit abandonment of Google's legal team working on behalf of innovation across Silicon Valley:
.. By settling rather than taking the case all the way ... Google has solved its own copyright problem -- but not anyone else's. Without a legal precedent about the copyright status of book scanning, future innovators are left to defend their own copyright lawsuits. In essence, Google has left its former copyright adversaries to maul any competitors that want to follow its lead.
Google will doubtless be considering the same endgame for the Viacom lawsuit against YouTube. If Google can strike a settlement with a large slice of the aggrieved copyright owners, then it solves the copyright problem for itself, while leaving it as a barrier to entry for YouTube's competitors.
But when innovators like Google cut individual deals, it weakens the Silicon Valley innovation ecology for everyone, because it leaves the smaller companies to carry on the fight against well-endowed opponents. Those kinds of cases threaten to yield bad legal precedents that tilt the rules against disruptive innovation generally.
- Stay Connected
-

TOC RSS Feeds
News Posts
Commentary Posts
Combined Feed
New to RSS?
Subscribe to the TOC newsletter. 
Follow TOC on Twitter. 
Join the TOC Facebook group. 
Join the TOC LinkedIn group. 
Get the TOC Headline Widget.
- Search
-
- TOC In-Depth
-
Impact of P2P and Free Distribution on Book Sales This report tests assumptions about free digital book distribution and P2P impact on sales. Learn more.
The StartWithXML report offers a pragmatic look at XML tools and publishing workflows. Learn more.
Dive into the skills and tools critical to the future of publishing. Learn more.
- TOC Community Topics
-




November 20, 2008 6:59 PM
thank goodness people have started to see this...
for a while there, i thought happy-talk was going to
rule the day -- and ruin our future in the process...
i'm losing the considerable respect i had for google,
because their self-serving twist in this case can only
solidify a conclusion that google has indeed become evil.
that's not a word i normally use, but google itself is
who brought it into the lexicon of this conversation.
this is a monopoly play, and it's evil.
-bowerbird
November 20, 2008 9:03 PM
You can choose your own content from the millions of articles on Wikipedia, then add them to your book, preview it and order a hard copy book to be delivered. These are individually customised books that you create for your own library on topics you are interested in. So you can have a book that contains articles on many different topics, not just a narrow one.
-----------------
williamgeorge
Sale By Owner
November 19, 2009 2:25 AM
Your conspicuous knowledge, longanimity, visceral wisdom and training submit made for a grapheme aggregation with lots of techniques which were leisurely to see and do . We had a lot of breeding which was noise gambler as it allowed us to mingle reach the system that we stodgy. I perception presumptuous to practicing what I learned. Way to go - thanks a mil for reaching so far!
Sara
find attorney
December 14, 2009 3:34 PM
I'm sorry,
I know a lot of people are big supporters of this google book search deal, but I think the big G is getting a little too big for its own britches. They don't seem to abide by their "Do No Evil" slogan anymore. People are starting to take notice google, and the competition is not too far away.