Film Criticism and YouTube Don't Play Nice

Mac Slocum
January 16, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | Listen

In an essay catalyzed by YouTube's removal of a film criticism archive, which included ripped clips from copyrighted movies, Matt Zoller Seitz addresses the disconnect between takedown policies and the gray areas of digital culture:

There should be a way to distinguish between piracy-for-profit (or unauthorized, free redistribution) and creative, interpretive, critical or political work that happens to use copyrighted material. And there must be an alternative to unilateral takedowns. The issues aren't just legal, they're practical. History has demonstrated that there's no copyright protection that can't be defeated, no corporate edict that can't be subverted. And given the technological sophistication that permits digital watermarking, there ought to be a way to make sampling of any sort, authorized or not, scaled to suit the filmmakers' means, profitable for the rights holders, and as fully automated as the copyright-infringement-scouring that's currently happening all over the Internet.

(Via the Reading 2.0 list)

Related Stories:

• Ruling: Consider Fair Use Before Issuing Takedowns
• Calling Google a Publisher Underestimates its Platform
• New Rulings Let Pubs Create Digital Archives With No Additional Royalties
• Piracy and Advertising: An Unlikely Union that Just Might Work