• Print

Virginia Open Sourcing Physics Textbook ("Flexbook")

I was part of a brief Twitter exchange recently with Cengage’s Ken Brooks about the cost of textbooks:

kenbrooks: @doctorow #toc That depends entirely on the type of book. A K-12 reading program costs $millions.

andrewsavikas: @kenbrooks not necessarily. See ck12.org

kenbrooks: @andrewsavikas Talk to McGraw Hill or Pearson about basal reading programs. The intricacies are staggering. #toc

I like Ken a lot personally (and respect him a ton professionally), and I have no reason to doubt that it does take millions to develop many educational programs. But my reference to ck12.org (whose founder, Neeru Khosla, keynoted at TOC 2008) was because if it does cost that much, then something’s wrong with the system, and that’s not likely to change without the work of groups like ck12.

In fact, Virgina is already in the process of developing an open-source “flexbook” for physics using the ck12 platform:

Secretary of Technology Aneesh Chopra and Secretary of Education Tom Morris today announced the selection of thirteen individuals to form a core team to pilot the development and release of an open–source physics “flexbook” for Virginia. This electronic material will focus on high school physics and contain contemporary and emerging 21st century physics and modern laboratory experiments.

The Virginia Physics “Flexbook” project is a collaborative effort of the Secretaries of Education and Technology and the Department of Education that seeks to elevate the quality of physics instruction across the Commonwealth by allowing educators to create and compile supplemental materials relating to 21st century physics in an open–source format that can be used to strengthen physics content. The Commonwealth is partnering with the Palo Alto, California–based non–profit, CK–12 on this initiative as they will provide the free, open–source technology platform to facilitate the publication of the newly developed content as a “flexbook” — defined simply as an adaptive, web–based set of instructional materials.

“We need transformational ideas to ensure all Virginians are educated to compete in an increasingly competitive global economy,” said Secretary Chopra. “This pilot initiative is a step in the right direction to introduce our students to contemporary physics topics and lab materials at no additional cost to the taxpayers or students,” added Secretary Morris.

There is certainly a place for the investment-intensive educational publishing programs that only a firm with the resources of Cengage or Pearson or McGraw-Hill can provide. But there’s also enormous opportunity to try new models that take advantage of the kind of collaboration that underpins all of academia to develop and distribute quality learning material for students at lower costs. (BTW, ck12 is hiring.)

  • bowerbird

    andrew said:
    > I like Ken a lot personally
    > (and respect him a ton professionally)

    when you include this kind of language in a critique,
    it implies that you believe he might take the critique
    as reflecting on him _personally_… why would he?
    and if he _did_, that’s _his_ fault, not _your_ fault.

    even if you _were_ to critique his job performance
    on a _personal_ level, if your various points were
    well-founded and strongly supported by evidence,
    should he be offended you would do such a thing?

    i have feelings, just like everybody else. (really!) ;+)
    and no, i don’t like to have my feelings get hurt.
    (nobody does.) but that’s precisely why i do not
    put my feelings in the middle of the road, where
    they will _certainly_ be run over by passing cars.

    > if it does cost that much,
    > then something’s wrong with the system

    how much does it cost o’reilly to publish each title?

    and if i were to say “if it does cost that much,
    then something’s wrong with _your_ system”,
    would you take it personally?

    would you respond that i know not of what i speak?

    would you consider the possibility i might be right?

    would you respond with an accounting of your costs?

    would you engage in a constructive dialog concerning
    the actions that might be taken to reduce those costs?

    or — if we wanna get into really thorny questions –
    what if there were good reasons why your company
    would _want_ to keep the fixed cost of each title high?

    -bowerbird

  • Todd

    For a second I thought this might dovetail into a discussion of Cengage’s custom “Flex-texts”…

  • Bob Martinengo

    The Mad, Mad World of Textbook Adoption by The Thomas B. Fordham Institute, with an introduction by Diane Ravitch, is a great little book – the title says it all.

    Anyone who hopes to make a dent in this market, even a sleek hi-tech non-profit like CK-12, had better read this book, and maybe Alice in Wonderland, for good measure.

  • http://blog.iseesystems.com Jeremy Merritt

    So this went live on Feb 27th. I got to meet the project lead and posted about the session on my company blog: http://tinyurl.com/bzd8a6

    I think VA is making the right step. Keeping things current easily, removing crippling copyright and making the content digital all in one move.

  • bowerbird

    > Keeping things current easily,
    > removing crippling copyright
    > and making the content digital
    > all in one move.

    yeah. pretty sweet.

    there’s only one thing wrong with this picture.

    somebody’s ox is being gored…
    their cash-cow is being sacrificed…

    and this “somebody” is a complex of corporate
    textbook publishers, who will be _ruthless_ in
    protecting their income-stream from this thief,
    and have deep pockets to finance their vendetta.

    so watch out for the push-back…

    in particular, i would look for these “retaliations”:

    * big lobbying efforts — in texas and california,
    the only states that matter concerning textbooks,
    since every other state just follows their lead –
    that will attempt to contain this upstart _legally_.
    this is how the corporations prefer to operate,
    since they’ve got the politicians in their pocket,
    and police power of the state is overpowering.
    plus they’ve already established “review boards”
    that rule on every textbook. expect rejections.

    * suits against open-source textbook companies.
    next to the politicians, corporations like _judges_.
    again, they’ve already got them in their pocket so
    it’s a nice friendly back-door to solve “problems”.
    get a judge to levy a huge judgment against the
    upstart, and that’ll put ‘em out of business quick.
    indeed, a fine against one will make ‘em all fold!
    and even if it doesn’t scare them off _entirely_,
    they’ll have to buy big insurance for protection,
    which helps to raise their cost of doing business
    to the point where they lose their price advantage.

    * smear campaigns in corporate-controlled “news”.
    horror stories will soon surface in the mass-media
    about these “dangerous” open-source textbooks.
    they’ll just redo all the old stories about wikipedia.

    * dirty-handed tricks to undermine the competition.
    open-source means _anyone_ can write the content,
    right? so look for corporations to have employees
    introduce havoc into the processes. they don’t even
    have to inject outright errors into the work, they can
    just create _controversy_ (e.g., a dialog on abortion)
    that causes everyone to jump into argument mode…

    * twisting people’s arms by breaking people’s legs…
    the corporations are in the mood to fire people now.
    so, if you publish textbooks, why not kill two birds
    with one stone? when you announce your big layoff,
    mention that one “reason” is open-source textbooks,
    and “ruining the economy” will ruin their reputation…
    watch how “i lost my job because of you” fuels anger.

    i could make more predictions, but you get the idea.

    do not forget that the corporations are _greedy_.
    they don’t like it when you disintermediate them.
    they will fight. and greedy people don’t fight fair.

    -bowerbird

  • George Moore

    I think The
    Virginia
    Physics FlexBook is an effort to update educational material more quickly than can be done with traditional textbooks. The typical review and procurement cycle of states and school systems, coupled with the several years it can take for changes to make their way into published texts, means that students in even the best schools could be using material that is a decade or more out of date.